Crippling Failure of Columns

This page provides the sections on the analysis of crippling failure in columns from the "Stress Analysis Manual," Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, October 1986.

Other related chapters from the Air Force "Stress Analysis Manual" can be seen to the right.

Nomenclature

A = area
b = linear dimension as indicated in diagrams
C = coefficient of constraint = (L/L' )2
E = modulus of elasticity
Fcc = allowable crippling stress
Fco = empirical constant in Johnson parabolic equation (column yield stress)
Fcol = maximum fiber stress for primary failure of a column
Fcy = compressive yield stress
h = height
I = moment of inertia
K = empirical constant
L = length
L' = effective length = L/√C
P = axial load
Pcc = crippling load
r = radius
t = thickness
μ = Poisson's ratio
ρ = radius of gyration = \( \sqrt{I/A} \)
Σ = summation

2.3.2 Introduction to Crippling Failure of Columns

In the previous sections, the primary failure of simple columns was considered. However, if a column has thin sections, it may fail at a load well below the critical load predicted for primary failure. Thus, a column must, in general, be checked for both primary failure and crippling. Primary failure may be assumed to be independent of crippling effects, in which case, a failure curve such as that shown in Figure 2-63 may be used. The right-hand portion of the curve describes the stress required for primary failure of the column at various effective slenderness ratios. This curve is cut off at the crippling stress level by the flat portion to the left.

Failure Curve Based on the Assumption of No Interaction Between Primary Failure and Crippling

If the interaction between crippling and primary failure is to be taken into account, the constant Fco in the Johnson-Euler equation may be set equal to the crippling stress Fcc. Although this procedure is more correct, it also introduces added complications, and only works for columns having a crippling stress less than the primary failure stress as L'/ρ approaches zero. Figures 2-64 and 2-65 show sets of Johnson-Euler curves for various materials. The curve used in a given case is the one that intercepts the ordinate at the value of Fcc for that column.

Johnson-Euler Column Curve - Aluminum Alloys

Johnson-Euler Column Curve - Magnesium Alloys

Johnson-Euler Column Curve - Steels

Johnson-Euler Column Curve - Titanium


Need a Column Buckling Calculator?

Try this column buckling calculator.

  • buckling analysis of long and intermediate-length columns loaded in compression
  • loading can be either central or eccentric


2.3.2.1 Crippling Stress of Round Tubes

Steel tubes for which the diameter-to-wall thickness ratio is less than 50 need not be checked for crippling. This gives us some general idea of the thinness required if a tube is to fail by crippling rather than by primary instability. A theoretically correct formula for the crippling stress of a tube is

$$ F_{cc} = { 1 \over \sqrt{ 3 (1 - \mu^2) } } { E t \over r } $$
(2-20)

where r is the mean radius and μ = Poisson's ratio. if μ is taken to be 0.3, as is the case for steel and aluminum alloys, we obtain

$$ F_{cc} = 0.605 { E t \over r } $$
(2-21)

This equation, however, is extremely unconservative for small values of t/r and should only be used for approximations in the early stages of design.

More conservative and accurate empirical methods are available for the treatment of tubular columns. If L/r is less than 0.75, use the equation

$$ { P_{cc} \over A } = F_{cc} = { 2 K \pi^2 r \over L^2 t } $$
(2-22)

where the critical stress coefficient, K, is given in Figure 2-66.

Critical Stress Coefficients for Thin-Walled Short Circular Cylinders Subjected to Axial Compression

If L/r is greater than 0.75, use the equation

$$ { P_{cc} \over A } = F_{cc} = C E ~{ t \over r } $$
(2-23)

where C is given in Figure 2-67.

Coefficient for Computing Critical Axial Compressive Stresses of Indeterminate Length and Long Cylinders

2.3.2.2 Sample Problem - Crippling Stress of Round Tubes

Given: The tubular aluminum column shown in Fignre 2-68.

Cross Section of Column Used for Illustration of Crippling Failure of Round Tube

Find: The crippling stress if

(a) L = 5 in.
(b) L = 60 in.

Solution: (a) In this case, L/r < 0.75 so we may use Equation (2-22)

$$ Z = { L^2 \over rt } \sqrt{ 1 - \mu^2 } = { (5)^2 \over 10(0.02) } \sqrt{ 1 - (0.3)^2 } = 119.5 $$
$$ {r \over t} = {10 \over 0.02} = 500 $$

From Figure 2-66, K = 11. Substituting this value into Equation (2-22), we find that

$$ F_{cc} = { 2 K \pi^2 r \over L^2 t } = { 2 (11) \pi^2 (10) \over (5)^2 (0.02) } = 4,350 ~\text{psi} $$

(b) If L = 60 in., L/r > 0.75 so that Equation (2-23) may be used

$$ {r \over t} = 500 $$

From Figure 2-67, C = 0.22. Substituting this value into Equation (2-23), we find that

$$ F_{cc} = 0.22 { E t \over r } = { 0.22 (10 \times 10^6) (0.02) \over 10 } = 4,400 ~\text{psi} $$

If the theoretically correct formula, Equation (2-20), is used for either of these two columns,

$$ F_{cc} = 0.605 { Et \over r } = 12,100 ~\text{psi} $$

This value may be seen to be much greater than those obtained from the more accurate empirical formulas.



Need a Column Buckling Calculator?

Try this column buckling calculator.

  • buckling analysis of long and intermediate-length columns loaded in compression
  • loading can be either central or eccentric


2.3.2.3 Crippling Stress of Outstanding Flanges

Two idealized cases of edge restraint of long flanges are shown in Figure 2-69. In case (a), the flange is fixed along its edge and the equation for its crippling stress is

$$ F_{cc} = { 1.09 E \over 1 - \mu^2 } \left({ t \over b }\right)^2 $$
(2-24)

The flange shown in (b) is hinged along its edge and the equation for its crippling stress is

$$ F_{cc} = { 0.416 E \over 1 - \mu^2 } \left({ t \over b }\right)^2 $$
(2-25)

A column flange is neither rigidly fixed nor hinged along its edge so its crippling stress lies between those given by Equations (2-24) and (2-25), the latter giving more conservative results.

Idealized Edge Constraints of Long Flanges

2.3.2.4 Crippling Stress of Angle Elements and Complex Shapes

The basic design equations for the crippling stress and load of the angle section shown in Figure 2-70 are

$$ { F_{cc} \over \sqrt{ F_{cy} E } } = { C_e \over (b'/t)^{0.75} } $$
(2-26)

and

$$ P_{cc} = \left[ C_e ~{ \sqrt{ F_{cy} E } \over (b'/t)^{0.75} } \right] ~A $$
(2-27)

Here b' is equal to (h+b)/2 as seen in Figure 2-69 and Ce is a constant dependent upon the fixity of the edges, as shown to the right of Figure 2-70.

Angle Section

The area of this angle is given by

$$ A = \left[ \left({b' \over t}\right) - 0.214 \left({r \over t}\right) \right] ~2 t^2 $$
(2-28)

Nondimensional plots of Equations (2-26) and (2-27) are shown in Figures 2-71 and 2-72, respectively. These plots may be used to facilitate the solution of angle problems. It must be noted that Equations (2-26) and (2-27) have no significance when Fcc is greater than Fcy. These cutoffs are shown for two alloys in the following figures.

Dimensionless Crippling Stress of Angles

Dimensionless Crippling Load of Angle

Many complex sections, such as those shown in Figure 2-73, may be treated by considering them to be composed of a number of angles. The crippling stress of these sections may be found by the following procedure: First, break the section up into a number of angles. Secondly, find the crippling load and area of each of the angles. Finally, find Fcc for the entire section from the following equation:

$$ F_{cc} = { \sum ~\text{Cripping Load of Angles} \over \sum ~\text{Area of Angles} } $$
(2-29)
Examples of Complex Sections

This procedure is illustrated in the following example.

2.3.2.5 Sample Problem- Crippling Stress of a Complex Shape

Given: Column with the cross sectional shape shown in Figure 2-74. It is composed of an aluminum alloy for which E = 107 psi and Fcy = 50 kips.

Cross Section of Column Used for Illustration of Crippling Failure of Complex Shape

Find: The crippling stress Fcc·

Solution: This section may be broken into three angle sections as shown by the broken lines above. The calculation of the crippling load and area of each angle section is summarized in the table below:

Crippling Load Calculation

The values of b and h in this table are as shown in Figure 2-70. The values of Pcc and A may either be found from Equations (2-27) and (2-28) or from Figure 2-72 which shows these equations in graphical form. The crippling stress may now be found from Equation (2-29) to be

$$ F_{cc} = { (1.33 + 1.72 + 1.72) ~t^2 \sqrt{ F_{cy} E } \over (32.5 + 64.0 + 83.9) ~t^2 } = 0.0264 \sqrt{F_{cy} E} $$

Substituting the material properties into the above equation gives

$$ F_{cc} = 0.0265 \sqrt{ (5 \times 10^4) (30 \times 10^6) } = 32,400 ~\text{psi} $$


Need a Column Buckling Calculator?

Try this column buckling calculator.

  • buckling analysis of long and intermediate-length columns loaded in compression
  • loading can be either central or eccentric


2.3.2.6 Crippling Stress of I Beams

Figure 2-75 shows an I section.

I Section

The crippling stress of a column of this shape is given by

$$ F_{cc} = { k_w ~\pi^2 E ~t_w^2 \over 12 (1 - \mu^2) h^2 } $$
(2-30)

where kw is given in Figure 2-76.

kw for Equation (2-30)